Summarized by Walter Sorochan,
Posted 2009 Updated February 10, 2011
There is controversy about the development of oil sand regions in the Canadian province of Alberta. There are major concerns about pollution of the environment, pollution of the Athabasca river, high incidence of cancer among indigent people in the area, the creation of acid rains that are wafted by winds across Saskatchewan and Manitoba into the great lakes area as acid rain and so on. On the positive side are royalty revenues to the province, bolstering of the Canadian economy and high employment.
Is the mining of oil from the sands a safe procedure? Is it all worth while? Will it provide an endless supply of oil as energy?
Providing oil from sand and shale at a profit for a sustainable time is dubious when the the selling price of a barrel of oil fluctuates periodically. Unanswered is also whether the refining technology can be cleaned up so as to minimize all pollutants. Current mining and refining processes are dependent on a continuing huge supply of water from the Athabasca river where the water level has been decreasing over the past 20 years. Future expansion of mining will require more and more water that appears to already be in short supply. Then there is the question of deferred restoration of mining excavations that created huge mountains of polluted earth and mine canyons. No environmentally viable plan exists for Tar Sands reclamation.
" Oil sands reclamation, particularly of tailings material, remains unproven. Without proof, the government is approving reclamation plans based upon good faith rather than hard fact." Report: Fact fiction No reclaimation 2008
Premier Stelmach and the oil companies have promised to restore the devistated landscape with greenery and trees within 10 years; but without any real contractual liquidity or certification.
All these concerns appear to be overlooked by the governments of Alberta and Canada. Contrary to the government of Alberta, most other countries in the world have stopped mining and refining oil from shale and sand. Does it make economic sense to be investing billions more good money behind a questionable investment where the technology is still much in the experimental stages?
Judge for yourself! The list of blue colored references below is not all inclusive but it is a good starting point. Please read and become informed!
Against Tar Sands list:
The most destructive project on earth: The most destructive project on earth
The waste materials are killing local birds, animals and increasing cancer rates among local people Tar sands wastes poisoning Canadians
Report card on current mining process: | report sands 1
TORONTO, October 8, 2008 – New transcontinental pipelines from Alberta’s oil sands and massive refinery expansions in the U.S. Midwest are creating a “pollution delivery system” that threatens air and water quality and human health in the Great Lakes Basin, expert panelists at the University of Toronto said today. Alberta oil sand project polluting N America
Bad publicity about polluting oil sands: | Alberta Premier defends sand oil
The report, titled "CRUDE OIL - Uncertainty About Future Oil Supply Makes It Important to Develop a Strategy for Addressing a Peak and Decline in Oil Production," outlines the threat to oil supply posed by global political instability and the lack of new oil field discovery: world running out of oil
Alberta’s Oil Sands: Treasure Chest or Pandora’s Box?
Shiell’s findings were astonishing; if Suncor had to pay for damages caused by their greenhouse gas emissions, profits would plummet by approximately 27 per cent per barrel. economic evaluation of oli sands project
Report: Fact or Fiction Oil Sands Reclamation:
For Tar Sands List:
There is a limited supply of oil. The world discoveries of new oil has
peaked. The tar sands give all of us longer time to find alternatives
sources of energy: Peak oil is history
Oil boom provides employment for Canadians recovering oil from shale
CBS video 60 minute story on Alberta oil sand project: CBS 60 minute story