Cancer Cure,  Induced Remission Therapy & Cancer Vaccine 
By Walter Sorochan

Posted February 05,  updated February 12, 2016;  Disclaimer The information presented here is for informative and educational purposes only and is not intended as curative or prescriptive advice. This paper is work in progress.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Introduction:

 Cancer vaccine is here! 

The cancer cure therapy attracted the attention of many viewers of the Bill Maher show on January 29, 2016.  Maher interviewed Dr. Sam Chachoua, MD from Australia, who claimed he had a cure for cancer.  Such a claim on national TV revived hope that a cure for cancer is here now!  Evans: Maher time for Chachoua 2016

But is such a claim real or a hoax? The doctor's story has its ups and downs as a research issue and also as a cure.  In the midst of controversy, this article examines the many issues of the claim, reviews briefly the history of spontaneous remissions of cancer, lists supporting evidence for Chachoua's claims and that a cancer vaccine has been developed .... but cancer has NOT been cured.    [ Read on to find out more ]

Cancer remission controversy

The research about Chachoua's claims of natural cancer remission began in honest attempts by this independent researchrt to get at the truth. But some real concerns surfaced about Chuachoua's claims.

Exploratory research about historical remissions in cancer uncovered more recent information about current research trends in this area.  Thus, the initial focus of verifying Chachoua's claims were expanded to updating the history behind cancer remission and also the current medical trend in applying viral vaccines to treating cancers.

Although mother nature's miraculous healing powers are not fully understood nor accepted at this time, many cancer researchers are starting to view vaccine induced spontaneous remissions as a real alternative to orthodoxy cancer therapy.

Needless to say, this emerging trend is causing a lot of confusion and controversy.

The claims by Chachoua are not new.  There have been many reports that cancer patients went into remission and have survived for many years thereafter.  Cases of spontaneous regression have fueled speculation that cancer may be vulnerable to sudden surges of the immune system, which can occur with a high fever, bacterial infection, blood transfusion, or major surgery or antibiotic usage. The reaction may deprive the tumor of something it needs to survive — blood, lactic acid, thyroid hormones — and thus starve it until it collapses and dies. The basic problem is inconsistency in explaining what caused the remissions.

Information explaining cancer vaccine is complicated and difficult to find.  Chachoua has simplified the medical jargon by using an easy to understand approach to how a cancer vaccine is made, how it works and the theory behind it.  Chachoua's explanations are supported by other medical researchers.  It is for these reasons that much of the information about cancer vaccine is taken from medical doctor and researcher Samir Chachoua and other medical researchers.  Researcher Sorochan has attempted to simplify the scientific explanations for the readers.

To begin with, Deardorff's brief comments about such cancer remissions are worth noting:  "In few rare cases, people defy cancer without medical treatment or by using therapies that are considered inadequate, a phenomenon known as spontaneous remission. Scientists have been fascinated and baffled by these developments for as long as cancer has been recognized as a disease. Was it luck? Or did the patients do something special to harness the awesome power of the immune system? Studying these exceptional people, however, is fraught with difficulty, controversy and the dangers of promoting bad science. The potential benefits of highlighting the unusual recoveries should be balanced against the risks, experts warn, including offering patients false hope, blaming those who succumb and encouraging alternative treatments in place of conventional methods that could prolong or save lives."   Deardorff: Spon Remission review 2014

Another researcher reviewing cancer remissions, Kelly Turner, PhD., concluded in her book, Radical Remission, that there were about nine factors playing a role in spontaneous remissions.  She concluded that we can shift the odds of remission in our favor by focusing on healing factors [ such as making significant lifestyle changes, radically altering the diet, using herbs, supplements and embracing social support ] that are often overlooked by medical experts.   Deardorff: Spon Remission review 2014

It is impossible to know how often spontaneous remission occurs because physicians often do not document or publish such cases, or the patient may simply stop showing up at the doctor's office and most cancer patients in the past century have been conveniently treated in one way or another with poor documentation.

However, lack of understanding about cancer and other shortcomings like healing bias may also suppress researchers and doctors having an open mind about remissions from cancer.  This article searches for the truth!  Back to top arrowup

Cancer in nature is often suppressed by infections

"Spontaneous regression occurs in most types of cancer and was recorded in the medical literature as early as 1742. The standard definition of spontaneous regression as “the partial or complete disappearance of a malignant tumor in the absence of treatment or in the presence of therapy considered inadequate to exert a significant influence on the disease” was composed by Dr. Tilden Everson and Dr. Warren Cole in the 1960s, with the further requirement that the original presence of cancer be proven by the microscopic examination of tissues.  Spontaneous regression of cancer is not a rare occurrence as thought to be; in an average month during 2002, medical journals published more than four articles on the subject.

It is interesting to note that the current primary cancer management procedures neither harness the benefits of patients’ own immune system nor stimulate it to achieve tumor regression but actively suppress it; thus it does not run parallel to body's own defensive mechanisms but opposes its natural role. An ideal cancer management would involve the stimulation of the immune system, its complex effective and reproducible in vivo mechanisms that fight cancer. Acute infections are beneficial in the prevention and regression of tumors. In conclusion, childhood febrile infections can prevent cancer in adulthood. Asepsis, fever control, surgery, and immunosuppressive therapies are known to have an inverse relation to cancer regression, while acute infection, fever, and cancer vaccines by the virtue of immuno-stimulation induce regression of cancer even in the most advanced stage of disease and prove that cancer is not an irreversible process without a cure." Jessy: Spontaneous regression of cancer 2011  Back to top arrowup

So .... back to Chachoua and his claim of the magic bullet for cancer!

What is the magic Chachoua cure?

Dr. Sam Chachoua's cure for cancer is a vaccine serum. The serum had viruses that would attach to cancer cells, marking them up for identification so the immune cells can destroy them. Currently, cancer cells cannot be identified by the immune system and that is why they are not attacked and destroyed.  Chachoua: Chachoua

Chachoua claims that such a vaccine serum cures cancer, HIV and heals heart disease and other disorders.  Such claims are supported by Coley's experiments prior to his death in 1936. Lenzer: Body can beat cancer 2007

What is vaccine serum?

Dr. Chachoua searched for non-toxic biological agents that could duplicate the findings in spontaneous remissions. He developed a range of anti-sera, vaccines and microbiological extracts that could target the cause of the disease and remove it from the body. In cancer, AIDS, and other conditions where the body cannot recognize or adequately deal with the disease, he developed “tagging agents” that could stick to the body of the cancer cells [disease], allowing cancer cells to be seen by the immune cells and then destroyed. In short, if a cancer cell can be made to look like a cold or flu, by “tagging” it with cold or flu fragments, then the body will eliminate it as it would a common infection. Perhaps the most dramatic capacity of this technology is its ability to repair cellular damage at the genetic level; purifying infected cells from HIV, regenerating hepatitis damaged livers, scarred heart tissue and even atrophied brain tissue in Alzheimer’s patients. Black:Victory over UCLA 2000   Back to top arrowup

Early opportunities for cancer remission

"The greatest value of Coley's Toxins is evident in the lives of patients who received his therapy. Rather than surviving additional years with cancer, many of these patients lived the rest of their lives without cancer."   Jessy: Spontaneous regression of cancer 2011

Coley’s toxin is a mixture of heat-killed Streptococcus pyogenes and Serratia marcescens. However, initially, many different strains of bacteria were used and a good therapeutic effect was observed with the infection of tumor patients with diphtheria, gonorrhea, hepatitis, influenza, malaria, measles, smallpox, syphilis and tuberculosis. One interesting observation is evident: efficacy is correlated with the degree of fever induced by the toxins/bacteria. +Patients treated with Coley’s toxin that develops a fever between 38-40°C respond three times better than patients with a lower body temperature. Oleksyszyn: Curing Cancer by remission 2014

"After the early success of Coley’s toxins, momentum was lost when Coley died in 1936. Emergence of chemotherapy and radiotherapy overshadowed its development while aseptic techniques gradually gained acceptance. After World War II, large-scale production of antibiotics and antipyretics also allowed better suppression of infections and fevers.

Opportunities for further clinical studies using Coley’s toxins were lost when despite decades of use, it was classified as a new drug by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Tightening of regulations regarding clinical trials of new drugs after the thalidomide incidents in the 1960s meant that Coley’s toxins were highly unlikely to pass the stringent safety requirements.

With fewer infections, spontaneous regressions became less common. An estimated yearly average of over twenty cases in the 1960-80s decreased to less than ten cases in the 1990s. It was gradually believed that the body’s immune system had a negligible role in tumor regression and focus was placed on chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Despite initial promise, these therapies have not fulfilled their full potential and the treatment for certain cancers remains out of reach.

In a curious turn of events, advances in molecular engineering have now provided us with the tools to transform immunotherapy into a viable alternative. Coley’s toxins have provided the foundations for early immunotherapeutic approaches and may potentially contribute significantly to the success of future immunotherapy."   Ho: Infections linked to cancer remission 2012

How Induced Remission Therapy works:

Induced Remission Therapies [IRT] possess ever-active cancer-reversing properties.  The treatment achieves its healing effects by both the use of vaccines prepared by Dr. Samir Chachoua's laboratory methods and clinical procedures. The information in this section is from Dr. Chachoua.  Chachoua: Chachoua   Chachoua: vaccine Patent 2003

The Induced Remission Therapies [IRT] do not destroy viral mechanisms but use them to displace the virus from its genetic locus. Genetic and other fragments originating from the patients own cells and/or non-pathogenic organism are used to eliminate the virus from its nuclear and cytoplasmic habitat. Many of these vaccines, by using the viruses own reverse transcriptase, insert themselves in the vicinity of the viral DNA, resulting in the latter’s removal and expulsion.

This induced vaccine therapy represents a new age in AIDS and cancer therapeutics aimed at genetic editing and correction. These vaccines do not harbor toxic effects, are therapeutic as well as preventative and are not made from HIV or fragments thereof; thereby eliminating the theoretical risk of contagion associated with HIV based vaccines.

"The advantage of inheriting an autoimmune response -- even an adverse one -- is that it penetrates the cells, including cancer cells. The agent required to change the appearance of a cancer cell is acquired by use of Dr. Chachoua's technique, and that agent is then planted into the cancer cell nucleus [ its heart and brain ]. Then the body develops an altered immune response that goes into the cancer cell and genetically corrects the disease. In effect, IRT makes the cancer cell look like something that the body's immunity will attack and then provides that very same immune response to fight the disease." 

"Patients undergoing spontaneous remission for cancer do so in response to the presence of an acute infection.  In contrast, a chronic infection actually can cause cancer.  That's because an aggressive and acute infection stimulates metabolic immune response [MIT] in cancer cells so that they commit preprogrammed suicide [apoptosis] and melt away."

"Cancer cells undergoing spontaneous remission survive in chaos!  They arise for only short periods of time to hold and restrain a pathological invader until the body can put up an appropriate immune response.  Then the cancer cells commit apoptotic suicide and leave the body as waste products."

"For example, in tetanus-injecting experiments on laboratory rats simultaneously given cancer by Dr. Chachoua, the rats did not die from tetanus when ordinarily they should have succumbed in days.   The encapsulation of tetanus organisms by cancer cells protected the animals against coming down with the infection.  The same thing happens in plants.  Crown gall disease is a plant cancer that protects the plant against infection with Agrobacterium tumefaciens."

The immune system fails to recognize a cancer cell as a pathogen and so it's dangerous characteristics remain hidden from any immune response.  But when the cancer cell is planted with a common infection such as measles, mumps, the flu or a cold virus, the antigens are expressed on the surface of the cancer cells for up to three weeks.  This gives a window of opportunity for the immune cells to rush in and attack the cancer cells.  Once the cancer cells have been deposed within the three weeks, then the immune system becomes blind once again to the cancer cells.

It is during this 3-week window that Dr. Chachoua's IRT is able to correct the genetic blueprint and correct the cell damage at the same gene level.  Cancers die during this 3-week period and remission takes place.

Below is a short video of how IRT works:

Dr. Samir Chachoua: treatment for AIDS, cancer and Heart disease   Nov 3, 2009:  3 mns.

Source: chachoua: cancer vaccine

Back to top arrowup

Basis for Chachoua's theory:

"Cancer seldom affects a person exhibiting an autoimmune illness." That is, a person with an autoimmune disorder will not get cancer.  Here are several explanations of this observation:

"Herpes simplex virus (HSV) was one of the first viruses to be adapted to attack cancer cells selectively, because it was well understood, easy to manipulate and relatively harmless in its natural state (merely causing cold sores) so likely to pose fewer risks. The herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) mutant 1716 lacks both copies of the ICP34.5 gene, and as a result is no longer able to replicate in terminally differentiated and non-dividing cells but will infect and cause lysis very efficiently in cancer cells, and this has proved to be an effective tumor-targeting strategy.  In a wide range of in vivo cancer models, the HSV1716 virus has induced tumor regression and increased survival times."  Chachoua: Promiise of cancer cure

All these observations led Chachoua to come up with something he called "nemesis theory", which states that for every disease there's an anti-disease organism which will specifically attack and destroy it.  Chachoua: Promiise of cancer cure Back to top arrowup

Your Body can beat cancer

In 1953 Parke-Davis ceased production of Coley's mixed bacterial vaccines, or MBVs. Yet as recently as 2005, doctors at Dartmouth and Harvard universities concluded that Coley may have been right that some infections, particularly those caused by Streptococcus, might cause tumor regression. In 1999, a comprehensive review was performed of scientific studies of Coley’s toxins. Scientists found that the 128 patients treated between 1890 and 1960 with Coley’s toxins fared as well as 1,675 similar patients treated with conventional methods in 1983. However, the researchers said the study was small and subject to bias, leaving their findings in doubt.

Currently, the toxins are still available on a “compassionate use” basis in nine countries, including Germany and the Bahamas; one clinic in the United States also uses a preparation based on Coley’s toxins.

Coley’s legacy lives on in the bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine now in use to treat some forms of bladder cancer. Doctors instill the bacillus into the bladders of patients who have been treated for superficial bladder cancer. The bacillus provokes the immune system to produce an inflammatory response that in turn prevents cancer recurrence. Derived from a bovine form of tuberculosis, BCG is used as a vaccine against TB in many parts of the world.

As doctors and patients have become increasingly aware of the limits of conventional treatments for certain cancers, some doctors are looking back to Coley’s toxins and how nature pulls off its occasional and surprising cures.  Lenzer: Body can beat cancer 2007

Nemesis organisms:  Chachoua: Chachoua

Chachoua got thousands of bottles in a laboratory and placed leukemia lymph node tumor biopsies in them. Each bottle had a particular organism growing inside it. The one with affinity for the cancer actually grabbed hold of the cancer and ate it. This protein 'web' actually grew as a fungus and encapsulated the tumor. Within a few days, there was a little bit of the cancer left. A couple of weeks later, no cancer, just the fungus!

So what this procedure did was give Chachoua a new therapeutic modality. This nemesis organism gave him highly specific chemicals that could be used to kill the cancer, but which can be made so the new modality does not attack any other sort of body tissue. Two, it gave Chachoua tagging complexes which stick to the outside of the cancer cells and make the cancer cells highly visible to the immune system. And three, it can give Chachoua a complete range of digestive enzymes which are specific for digesting the cancer cells and the cancers alone. So this new form of serum not just kills the disease, it also cleans up after itself!

With use of the tagging system, if the immune system looks at this fibrillary network of protein stuck onto the outside of the cancer cell, it doesn't see cancer; it sees a bug and it wants to go after the bug. Now, you don't inject the bug; you purify the protein extract that sticks to the cancer and you inject that. That then sticks to the cancer cells in the body. The body's immune cells can then see it and recognize it because it's tagged with bacterial, fungal or viral protein.

The process of the immune system getting rid of a cough or a cold in a week or two is similar to how Chachoua's serum gets rid of cancer cells.. His vaccine can get rid of cancer: make the cancer look like a cough or a cold by sticking cough or cold particles on it, and have the immune system attack the cancer, destroy it and remove it.

However, there were instances where patients had a regression several months or years after treatment of their tumors with a tagging complex. This suggested that tagging the cancer was not the be-all and end-all, that tagging the cancer cell still didn't cure cancer the disease. This suggested to Chachoua that there was another factor at work.  Back to top arrowup

The Rational for Spontaneous Remission - the historical basis for Chachoua's vaccine  Chachoua: Part 2 

The one thing Chachoua found depressing about alternative and conventional therapy is that they both totally ignored the phenomenon of "spontaneous remission" .... which is perhaps the most natural phenomenon which repeatedly tells us how to cure terminal disease. "Spontaneous remission" is a term given to miraculous healings, where people on their death bed ’rise from the dead’ within two to three days without a trace of their disease. It’s a phenomenon that’s been reported in the literature but hardly ever investigated.

The data on spontaneous remission strongly suggest that just before a person with cancer, heart disease, arthritis or any of the other terminal diseases has a spontaneous remission or a cure of their disease, they suffer what seems to be a viral or bacterial or some form of severe infection.  Here are three examples of this:

This was noticed by a Dr Didot, in France, who noted that the existence of syphilis precluded the appearance of cancer. If prostitutes had syphilis, they were very unlikely to develop cancer. This doctor actually treated 20 cancer patients with syphilis and, of those 20, 14 went into total remission. As the syphilis grew, it munched up the cancer; the cancer went away. Another three patients did pretty well, and a couple of them died of the syphilis. But this was a few hundred years ago, and given the choice between "the Big C" and "the Big S."  Today we can cure syphilis with a couple of shots of penicillin but treating cancer is not the came!

Late last century, Dr William Coley had a patient who had bone cancer and developed a severe syphilis or skin infection. As the skin infection grew, it munched on the bone cancer and the bone cancer disappeared. Dr Coley went on to develop what he called "Coley’s toxins" and used them for many years as a therapy that got quite good results.

It’s been long known that in areas where malaria exists, there’s no cancer; and when you get rid of malaria, drain the swamps, kill the mosquitoes, the cancer rate rises. People who have cancer and who catch malaria have a chance of going into remission. Just recently, Dr Henry Heimlich [who developed the Heimlich maneuver for preventing choking] injected a few AIDS patients with malaria and managed to get them into some form of remission where they improved and stayed stable at the improved level.

All these observations led Chachoua to come up with something called "nemesis theory", which states that for every disease there’s an anti-disease organism which will specifically attack and destroy it.

This then led to the development of "nemesis therapy", where he made extracts of these "nemesis organisms" with which to treat specific diseases like cancer and Aids.  Chachoua: Part 2  Back to top arrowup

Chachoua's Strange Observation about Remission

"An interesting observation was made about 20 years ago when leukemia patients were treated by wiping out their bone marrow and then giving them somebody else's bone marrow. It was found that the leukemia would invariably recur. One cell or a few cells get loose and the disease comes back. This may account for some of the cancer recurrences, but to try to explain all cancer recurrences that way, the medical term for that is "crap"!

What we know from those leukemia trials is that they wiped out the patient's bone marrow. There was nothing left! Doctors gave that patient someone else's bone marrow. Six months later, the leukemia came back. Now, if it was a leftover cell, then when you check that leukemia cell you should find that it's the same as the leukemia you treated before the patient went into remission, true? It should be the same cell that came back. However, when they ran DNA checks, they found that not only that it was not the same cell, but that it belonged to the donor. It was the donor's bone marrow that had turned into leukemia cells!

This finding has been published in the conventional medical literature, and it means that cancer as a disease is not cancer the cell. There is something in the body of a patient which regenerates and augments cancer, the cancer cell. And if you don't address that, then you won't get rid of the disease.

In light of this information, Chachoua kept saving all these little bottles, cooking up these nemesis organisms and tagging them, but something kept showing up over and over and over again. He would incubate the cancer with another organism-say, an E. coli-and find other organisms growing when the cancer cells died, that he had not put in there. They would usually be staphylococcal or streptococcal in appearance. Acid-fast bacilli sometimes would show up, depending on what culture medium was used and for how long he cultured them.

Now this is really interesting. What Chachoua noticed was what some people would call "pleomorphism" in progress. A couple of elements would develop these elongated rodlike structures, and you could actually see a coccal form changing into a rodlike form. Pleomorphism in action.  This biological phenomenon kept reoccurring and was baffling."   Chachoua: Promiise of cancer cure  Chachoua: Part 2

The theory of pleomorphism suggests that a microbe could evolve through many forms from virus to bacterium to yeast to fungus to mold and could even de-evolve back to a pre-virus form [ simatid] again.  This theory up to now has been rejected by the medical establishment for obvious reasons.  Today's medical system is based on metamorphism

Pleomorphism is a new-old idea that most persons may not understand and medical doctors have been schooled to reject.  The inner terrain [ colon] argument against Pasteur’s germ theory [ metamorphism] gained more support with pleomorphism. Independent research determined that microbes already exist within the body, more of them than human cells, and morph according to their cellular environment. They become pathogenic as they’re forced to survive in a damaged cellular environment. The waste products of these microbes create even more damage. Further research determined that these microbes often already exist in human cells in benign states. They don’t all come from “out there”, and they’re not pathogenic in healthy environments; they simply become so in unhealthy toxic environments [ as within the colon ]. What does come from “out there” are environmental toxins and toxic foods that make it difficult for benign microbes to survive. Then they morph into those nasty little critters. [ When a grub turns into a butterfly, this is know as metamorphism, if it could turn back into a grub again that would be known as Pleomorphism. ] 

Below drawings of different basic forms of pleomorphs [missing are simatids, yeasts, fungus]:

basic forms

Basic forms: spores & flagellation of bacteria: A coccus; B diplococcus; C streptococcus; D staphylococcus; E sarcines ;F rods; G vibriones; H corynebacteria; I spores (1/2=central, 3=terminal, 4=subterminal; J spirilles; K peritrichous flagellation; L 1=monopolar monotrichous flagellation, 2=monopolar polytrichous flagellation.  Source: Linda Charlotte Fehr 


Video - - Smallest unit of life [Somatid] in the blood: 1:02 mins.

Source: Mar 23, 2012 AWH Live human blood observed through a phase contrast microscope with 3,600 times magnification. 

For more information about metamorphism vs Pleomorphism go to New medicine

The video below explains this phenomenon:

Pleomorphism explained video  9:55 mns long

Source: New Biology  Back to top arrowup

Success Rate:

Dr Chachoua's sera and vaccines have been tested. They've proven to be more effective than anything else in history. His cancer serum has been proven to be 85% effective against cancers while his AIDS serum is 99% effective in putting AIDS into remission for six months to upwards of three years.  EnCognitive: Chachoua

NOTE: The vaccines that he does have possession of and all the new ones that he develops are still much more effective and without the negative side effects from Conventional Medicine therapy.  Dreddy: blog

Old way of making serum vaccines:  Chachoua: Part 2

Chachoua compares the old way of making serum to fight diseases with using antibiotics.

"One of the easiest ways to deal with the greatest plague today is to use an animal system that’s resistant to the plague, and treat and cure the people suffering from the disease. A hundred years ago, before we had antibiotics, the only therapy we had for pneumonia, smallpox and polio was horse serum.

They’d get a horse, shoot it with a disease, draw the horse serum out, shoot that into the person and cure them. That was therapy to deal with the plagues a hundred years ago.

But what happens if you do apply it now? Here’s the case of a young man with AIDS. He’s 32 years old. He’s got a pneumocystis pneumonia, he’s short of breath, he’s got a T-cell count of 80 and a T4/T8 imbalance. So, essentially, his blood, his virus, is extracted out; an animal, such as a horse, is vaccinated with his blood; the antiserum from the animal is then purified against this patient’s blood so it doesn’t cause allergic reactions; and the patient is treated with the horse’s serum.

And we see that within 24 hours, the pneumocystis pneumonia clears up. That’s pretty remarkable considering that the best that antibiotics can do, if they can clear it, is take days to weeks. This patient’s symptoms resolved; his T-cell count went up to 780 within 10 days from a low of 80, and his T4/T8 ratio became normal.  Chachoua: Part 2   Back to top arrowup

Cost of Dr Chachoua's therapy:  EnCognitive: Chachoua

Basic IRT vaccine for a short time is made by using measles or mumps virus or an animal virus at a cost of just a few hundred dollars. More sophisticated vaccines a for longer time may cost several thousand dollars. Dr. Sam has formed the Save-a-Life Foundation located in Boulder, Colorado, that raises funding for more IRT research and on occasion does provide financial assistance.

Dr. Sam Chachoua's therapies for HIV/AIDS, Heart Disease, and Cancer are now available. All you need is a physician willing to administer it.

The price is APPROXIMATELY $10,000.00 per therapy. Each therapy is administered in seven injections over a 15 day period. People with cardiovascular disease report that they begin to feel better within minutes of the first injections.  EnCognitive: Chachoua

Dr Sam is willing to work with your physician. If you wish to have Dr Sam contact you, write to:   info@mnwelldir.org.

Availability - Where to get IRT therapy:

IRT is used extensively by German cancer therapies, and in  the Bahamas, Central And South America, Mexico, Guatemala and Argentina.   ORT os available as a vaccine in United States and Canada under the Health Freedoms Act.   Dr. Chachoua does not sell this vaccine and offers free training to practicing physicians so the physicians may implement it for patients. Walker: Induced Remission Therapy

Below is a video about shattering the myth of cancer:

Dr. Sam Chachoua - Shattering the Myth of Incurable Disease   2:00 hours

Back to top arrowup

Chachoua's troubles:

Claims made by Chachoua having a vaccine to cure cancer have been rejected by the medical establishment, The USA Communicable Disease Center and Federal Food and Drug Administration.  These rejections have persisted over the past 30 years, despite scientific proof and acceptance of his cancer cures in many parts of the world.  Such rejections, especially in Canada and the United States, have made life miserable for Dr. Chachoua.  You can read about his misfortunes at:  Black:Victory over UCLA 2000  EnCognitive: Chachoua  Dreddy: blog

Evidence supporting Chachoua's observation and theory of microbial changes occurring in cancer remissions:

This researcher found numerous articles quoting the research being done on cancer remissions linked to the immune system. Spontaneous remission therapies, like that of Chachoua, are no longer being suppressed.     Agarwal: Spontaneous regression of an untreated lung cancer 2010  Cann: Spontaneous regression of cancer 2002   Deardorff: Spon Remission review 2014  Donnelly: Vaccine progress 2005   Gulley: Vaccination of cancer patients 2008   Ho: Infections linked to cancer remission 2012   Jessy: Spontaneous regression of cancer 2011   Lenzer: Body can beat cancer 2007   Printz: Spontaneous regression delimma 2001   Ricci: Spont Regression Review 2010    Rochlitz virus vaccine tested in cancer 2003   Soussi: Serum of cancer patients 2000   Walker: Induced Remission Therapy   Oleksyszyn: Curing Cancer by remission 2014  Cantwell: Bacteria causing leukemia 2012  Salanti: binding malaria virus to cancer 2015

Kelly Turner's book on Radical Remission: "shows how we can shift the odds of remission in our favor. She gathered information for her PhD dissertation at UC, Berkeley, spending a year traveling around the world to meet and learn from alternative cancer healers. She also interviewed over a thousand people who had experienced “spontaneous” remissions from their advanced cancers. Turner does not ask anyone to abandon conventional therapy, but instructs us on how to add healing factors that are often overlooked.”

During the course of the study, Kelly identified more than seventy-five factors that cancer survivors said they used as a part of their healing journey. Nine of these factors were used by almost every one of them. Eight of these are as follows:  Salber: Turner keys to cancer healing 2016

  • Radically changing your diet
  • Taking control of your health [My personal favorite as I have heard it described as an important element by so many empowered patients]
  • Following your intuition
  • Using herbs and supplements [Kelly is careful to state that this should be done under a doctor’s supervision]
  • Increasing positive emotions
  • Embracing social support
  • Deepening your spiritual connection
  • Having strong reasons for living

David Spiegel, a professor at the Stanford University School of Medicine, published a paper in 1989 in The Lancet, showing that women with terminal breast cancer who were enrolled in supportive therapy had a significant survival advantage over women who were not enrolled in support groups. Women who were in support groups experienced an improved quality of life. Lenzer: Body can beat cancer 2007

Wiki: virus - cancer connection:  "Herpes simplex virus (HSV) was one of the first viruses to be adapted to attack cancer cells selectively, because it was well understood, easy to manipulate and relatively harmless in its natural state (merely causing cold sores) so likely to pose fewer risks. The herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) mutant 1716 lacks both copies of the ICP34.5 gene, and as a result is no longer able to replicate in terminally differentiated and non-dividing cells but will infect and cause lysis very efficiently in cancer cells, and this has proved to be an effective tumor-targeting strategy.  In a wide range of in vivo cancer models, the HSV1716 virus has induced tumor regression and increased survival times.  Other oncolytic viruses based on HSV have also been developed and are in clinical trials, most notably  GM-CSF, developed by Amgen, which has successfully completed a pivotal Phase III trial for advanced melanoma. This study met its primary endpoint (durable response rate) with a very high degree of statistical significance in March 2013, the first positive phase 3 study for an oncolytic virus in the western world."  Wiki: virus - cancer connection

An Onocolytic virus is one that preferentially infects and kills  cancer cells.  As the infected cancer cells are destroyed by lysis they release new infectious virus particles to help destroy the remaining tumor. Oncolytic viruses are thought not only to cause direct destruction of the tumor cells, but also to stimulate host anti-tumor immune responses.

Throughout the history of medicine, physicians have recorded cases of spontaneous remission. Such cases involve not just cancer but conditions like aortic aneurysm, a deadly ballooning of the heart’s major artery; Peyronie’s disease, a deformity of the penis; and childhood cataracts.  Lenzer: Body can beat cancer 2007

Bacteria seem to cause the genes to promote tumor growth rather than suppress it. On top of that, changes in the bacterial community in a tumor were associated with advanced cancers instead of early ones. Eng: Bacteria cause cancer 2015
Bacteria, primarily in the coccus-like form in microscopic tissue sections, are found in various forms of cancer.  Parsonnet: Bacterial infection causes cancer 1995   Tontonoz: Bacteria cancer link 2014  Eng: Bacteria cause cancer 2015 In addition, similar microbes have been observed in non-cancerous diseases, such as sarcoidosis, lupus erythematosus, scleroderma, and others.

Cantwell reviewed the confirmations of numerous scientists about the phenomenon of pleomorphism [ microbes changing from one form to another ] occurring in cancer patients. Although such microbes are still looked upon with disbelief by many bacteriologists, this pleomorphism is consistent with bacteria cultured and studied by various cancer microbial researchers over the past century. Cantwell: Bacteria causing leukemia 2012

When bacteria are threatened by the immune system or by antibiotics they may lose their cell-wall and assume a different growth form that renders them less susceptible to attack by the immune system. There is no observable inflammation or other symptoms and this mystifies most medical doctors as they have been schooled that one bacteria divides into two same bacteria form and not transforming into a different microbe.

Although the idea of a cancer microbe is medical heresy, there is ample data to show that cancer patients are highly prone to bacterial infection. Wiki: Cancer bacteria  When dis-ease occurs these microbes become aggressive, giving rise to a host of diseases, some of which are cancerous, and others that are inflammatory, degenerative, or simply transitory. Another reason for physicians to doubt that a single type of germ could cause such a variety of pathologic effects.

Mostly ignored over the past century is research showing that pleomorphic bacteria, particularly unusual growth forms of mycobacteria, are implicated in Hodgkin’s and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Mycobacteria not only cause human TB and other forms of “atypical” tuberculosis, but produce various other inflammations in many different life forms.  Cantwell reports many cancer researchers whose researches confirm Chachoua's claims. Cantwell: Bacteria causing leukemia 2012

Another recent classic development supporting microbes causing cancer was the discovery that stomach ulcers was caused by a bacteria:  "In 2005 the Nobel Prize in medicine was given to two Australian researchers, microbiologist Barry J Marshall and pathologist J Robin Warren, who discovered that stomach ulcers were caused by bacteria that millions of people carry normally in their stomach. For a century these bacteria, now identifiable in tissue with a special tissue stain, went undetected by physicians, all of whom were taught that bacteria could not live in the acid environment of the stomach. Now a curative antibiotic treatment has been designed to treat Helicobacter pylori infection. We also now recognize that chronic infection with helicobacteria can lead to stomach cancer, and also to a lymphoma cancer of the stomach, known as "MALT-lymphoma" (mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma)."  Cantwell: Hodgkin's disease & bacteria 2006  Tontonoz: Bacteria cancer link 2014

A new paper in The Lancet takes a look at the very best data on the prevalence of infection-caused cancers and comes up with some striking numbers. Overall, they estimate that 16% of cancer cases worldwide in 2008 had an infectious cause—2 million out of 12.7 million. And because this paper only looked at infectious agents that are clearly carcinogenic and avoided those where there was not much data on, 2 million cases total is probably something of an underestimate. Greenwood: 16% Viruses & bacteria cause cancers 2012  This very recent confession from a renown medical journal helps to vindicate Chachoua's claims and the issue about viruses and bacteria causing cancer.

In 2015, writer-reporter Bushak makes reference to the new approach of microbes and immunology to fighting cancer.  There is definitely as shift from the traditional use of radiation, chemotherapy and surgery to using immunology to fight cancer.  Bushak: Programming bacteria to kill cancer 2015  Back to top arrowup

A Second Cancer Vaccine

A final blow to the cancer industry in 2015 is a viral vaccine to fight 9 out of 10 cancers.   The researchers, based at the University of Copenhagen and University of British Columbia, had originally been trying to develop a vaccine to prevent pregnant women becoming infected with malaria; because they’re particularly prone to the disease.

In the laboratory, scientists have created the protein that the malaria parasite uses to adhere to the placenta and added a toxin. The researchers modified their VAR2CSA protein so that it contained a cancer-killing toxin [now a virus vaccine], and added this to cancer cells grown in the lab. They also tested the vaccine by treating mice with prostate cancer, melanoma and a type of lymphoma. Their experiments showed that the VAR2CSA was able to stick to, and kill, the cancer cells –-- but left healthy cells alone. This combination of malaria protein and toxin seeks out the cancer cells, is absorbed, the toxin released inside, and then the cancer cells die.

In collaboration, the two university research groups have tested thousands of samples from brain tumors to leukemias and a general picture emerges to indicate that the malaria protein is able attack more than 90% of all types of tumors.

In collaboration with the scientists behind the discovery, the University of Copenhagen has created the biotech company, VAR2pharmaceuticals, which will drive the clinical development forward. The research teams working with Ali Salanti [U Copenhagen] and Mads Daugaard [UBC] are now working purposefully toward being able to conduct tests on humans.

Researcher Ali Salanti states that he expects his new company to be able to market his cancer vaccine within four years.  McCarthy: new therapy to fight most cancers 2015  

 This latest 2015 study replicated Chachua's original study. 

The image below illustrates this replicated study:

virus malaria-cancer Summary Link between malaria virus and cancer cells.

On left --- Plasmodium falciparum engineer infected erythrocytes to present the malarial protein, VAR2CSA [ light blue color ], which binds a distinct type chondroitin sulfate (CS) exclusively expressed in the placenta.

On right --- Here, we show that the same CS modification is present on a high proportion of malignant cells and that it can be specifically targeted by recombinant VAR2CSA (rVAR2) [ light blue color ].

In tumors, placental-like CS chains are linked to a limited repertoire of cancer-associated proteoglycans including CD44 and CSPG4. The rVAR2 protein localizes to tumors in vivo and rVAR2 fused to diphtheria toxin or conjugated to hemiasterlin compounds strongly inhibits in vivo tumor cell growth and metastasis.

Our data demonstrate how an evolutionarily refined parasite-derived protein can be exploited to target a common, but complex, malignancy-associated glycosaminoglycan modification. Salanti: binding malaria virus to cancer 2015  Back to top arrowup

 A cancer vaccine is almost here! 

Remission Case of: John Matzke

Can cancer be cured?

Medical doctors have been telling their cancer patients that if they are free from cancer detection for five years, then they are free of cancer.  But how does a medical doctor keep such credibility  when cancer comes back years later?  This is what often happens time and time again.  So what does a 5-year survival rate really mean?

Pesman interprets this 'cure' phrase as follows:  "Cancer free relates to the percentage of people in research studies who were still alive five years after diagnosis.  In brief, "five-year survival" is a term doctors and researchers use as a benchmark—between themselves. Five-year survival rates were introduced in the 1930s not to point patients toward notions of a cure, but because cancer specialists back then considered five-year survival a nearly unattainable goal."  Pesmen: what cure means 2007

According to the most recent data collected by the National Cancer Institute [NCI], the five-year survival rate for colorectal cancer is 63 percent. For breast cancer it’s 86 percent, while for cancer of the lung, the five-year rate is just 15 percent.  National Cancer Institute

Solid tumors, such as breast, colorectal and prostate cancers, that have cellular doubling times of 100 days or longer, remain a more mysterious animal. Their microscopic cells can hide, even through apparent remission, evading screening techniques. Long-term behavior of these tumors is tougher to predict, thus the language of survival rates instead of cure. Pesmen: what cure means 2007

That a cancer patient is free of cancer symptoms for a period of time does not diminish having a sense of feeling good and healthy and being able to enjoy life as a normal person.  Any length of remission is a time to celebrate!

No matter the numbers, “cancer-free” doesn’t equal “cure.”  Cancer free means chances [%] of survival and not cure. Disease-free survival is a statistic that is the percentage of patients who have no signs of cancer during a certain period of time after treatment. Other names for this statistic are recurrence-free or progression-free survival.  National Cancer Institute

"Cure means that there are no traces of your cancer after treatment and the cancer will never come back. [Medical science now tells us this does not happen in our bodies.]  Remission means that the signs and symptoms of your cancer are reduced. Remission can be partial or complete. In a complete remission, all signs and symptoms of cancer have disappeared. If you remain in complete remission for 5 years or more, some doctors may say that you are cured. Still, some cancer cells can remain in your body for many years after treatment. These cells may cause the cancer to come back one day. For cancers that return, most do so within the first 5 years after treatment. But, there is a chance that cancer will come back later. For this reason, doctors cannot say for sure that you are cured. The most they can say is that there are no signs of cancer at this time." National Cancer Institute  Back to top arrowup

Conclusions:

It is the opinion of this researcher, based on the medical interpretation of cure, that we do not have a cure for cancer. But in 2016, we do have two cancer vaccines!  The new vaccine entity basically replicates Chachoua's virus vaccine.  Cancer vaccine is a new way to fight cancer.

Spontaneous regression of cancer is a phenomenon that is not well understood. It has been discredited and suppressed for many years.  While the mechanisms are not entirely clear, it has been hypothesized and validated that infections, fever and cancer are linked. Studies have shown that infections and fever are involved in tumor regression and are associated with improved clinical outcomes.  So, yes, the review of research about cancer remission supports Dr. Samir Chachoua's claims that a viral vaccine injected into a cancer patient can arouse the immune system, that in turn, may very well kill cancer cells and restore life cancer free for extended periods of time.  [ another claim is that cancer cells return in form to somatic cells ]  There is little agreement about such mechanisms but two observations in cancer patients are of particular interest: first, infections have been shown to halt tumor progression and second, development of fever has been associated with improved prognosis.

Based on the most recent confirmation of a cancer vaccine by two different sources, as well as other reports about infections sending cancer into remission, it can be postulated that cancer can be sent into remission for unknown periods of time.  Since the human body has been programmed to live [ co-habit ] with trillions of colon bacteria, pleomorphism is as yet an unrecognized phenomenon that is also part of the biological system.  This means that cancer cells are also a part of an evolving human process.  We will never wipe out all cancer cells in the body. A person who has been treated successfully for cancer and remains cancer free for five years is often declared cancer free.  But this claim of being cancer free is a misnomer as cancer cells may  occur in numbers too small to be identified or measured as cancer.

We should expect to live in harmony with continuous very small number of cancer cells in a somewhat dormant state.  Cancer cells could explode when body-cancer environment conditions are conducive, especially when the good bacteria are displaced by bad bacteria thriving on a poor or inadequate human diet.  A poor diet feeds the bad bacteria that, in turn, excrete toxins that activate cancer cells.  On the other hand, eating a healthy diet keeps cancer under control. Thus, the new interpretation of cancer free should be managing cancer and having cancer under control. 

Thus, cancer will never be cured. National Cancer Institute  Pesmen: what cure means 2007   But we can prevent it and use cancer viral vaccines to control it. Furthermore, cancer cells can be prevented from increasing in dangerous numbers.  New information about the importance of bad bacteria in the colon causing diseases, immune-digestive system link, leaky gut syndrome, methylation and epigenetics also provide us with new ways of preventing cancer.  An inexpensive way of preventing cancer is to ingest seeds like almonds and apricot seeds.

There is no longer any excuse to be ignorant of research pointing to bacteria as a possible cause of cancer, particularly when evidence of such bacteria resides in the medical literature. Previously, the contents of medical journals were closed to most people who could not gain entrance to a medical library. By use of Internet search engines and the PubMed website, published medical literature is now easily available to everyone via the click of a mouse. 

The realistic truth is that the cancer war waged by the orthodox medical establishment has been a dismal failure.  The cancer establishment continues to protect its turf! Research since 2010 has been shifting from surgery, radiation and chemotherapy to using the immune system to fight cancer. More oncologists are beginning to respect and accept the possibility of this shift in cancer. Ho: Infections linked to cancer remission 2012   Lenzer: Body can beat cancer 2007  Bushak: Programming bacteria to kill cancer 2015

“I have not given chemotherapy to a person with melanoma for the past two years,” says Dr. Antoni Ribas, a medical oncologist at UCLA who treats mainly melanoma patients. “The days of chemotherapy for these diseases are over.”  Bushak: Programming bacteria to kill cancer 2015

The war on cancer is being won in 2015 - 2020 for all mankind. It is not going to be a slam dunk .... for the old die-hards will not accept this without a fight!  You can expect more entities to declare their brand of cancer vaccine.  The race to bring cancer vaccine to the market has begun.  This is the beginning of a new health era.  

Chachoua's effort will indeed be recognized in spite of been rejected and suppressed since 1985.

Your feedback on this article is most appreciated. Thank you: E-mail author

Go to main menu  Back to top arrowup

References:

Agarwal Pawan & Anil Kumar Kapoor & Arif Khan & Vivek Agarwal, "Spontaneous regression of an untreated lung cancer," Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2010, 26:173–175.   Agarwal: Spontaneous regression of an untreated lung cancer 2010

Black Joel, "A Victory for Life and Truth", Vaccination News, 2000.  Black:Victory over UCLA 2000

Bushak Lecia, "Programming bacteria to kill cancer cells," July 20, 2015.   Bushak: Programming bacteria to kill cancer 2015

Cann Hoption , van Netten JP, van Netten C, Glover DW., "Spontaneous regression: a hidden treasure buried in time," Med Hypotheses, February 2002 ;58(2):115-9.   Cann: Spontaneous regression of cancer 2002

"Abstract: Spontaneous tumor regression is a phenomenon that has been observed for hundreds, if not thousands of years. Although the term spontaneous implies 'without apparent cause', a review of case reports over the last several hundred years demonstrates that regression generally coincides with acute infections. Observations of this non-specific effect led to the emergence of active cancer immunotherapies by the 1700s. By the 1890s, William Coley refined this approach with a bacterial vaccine which, when administered properly, could induce complete regression of extensive metastatic disease. Unfortunately, after Coley's death, his vaccine and technique fell into obscurity. Modern approaches to treatment have reduced the occurrence of spontaneous regressions. Aseptic techniques and antibiotics significantly reduce postoperative infections, while chemotherapy and radiation impair immune activation even when an infection does occur. More than a century after its inception, Coley's vaccine and aggressive approach to treatment may still be one of most effective immunotherapies for cancer."

Cantwell Alan, "Ignored Bacteria And The Cause Of Lymphoma Cancer," Rense.com, November 6, 2012.  Cantwell: Bacteria causing leukemia 2012

Cantwell AR Jr. "Pleomorphic Bacteria as a Cause of Hodgkin's Disease (Hodgkin's lymphoma): A Review of the Literature," JOIMR, February 21, 2006; 4(1):1.  Cantwell: Hodgkin's disease & bacteria 2006

Chachoua Samir, "Dr. Samir Chachoua."  Chachoua: Chachoua

Chachoua Samir, "The Challenge, The Promise & The Cure - Effective Aids and cancer treatment,"   Chachoua: Promiise of cancer cure

Chachoua, Samir, "Use of disease-associated organisms US 20030103900 A1," Patent, Jun 5, 2003. Chachoua: vaccine Patent 2003

Abstract: A method for the identification, production and use of disease and condition specific diagnostic, therapeutic and preventative agents from naturally occurring microorganisms, organisms, extracts or modifications thereof, and from other chemical or physical agents. Diagnostic, screening and therapeutic devices are also disclosed.

Dreddy, "Dr. Sam Chachoua's Induced Remission Therapy??" DreddyClinic.com. January 05, 2013.  Dreddy: blog

Chachoua, Samir, " Induced remission therapy our best hope against cancer, Part 1," Chachoua: Part 1

Chachoua Samir, "Part 2: Lecture at the 2nd World Congress on Cancer,"  Chachoua: Part 2    Editor: Chachoua lecture World Congress

Deardorff Julie, "Spontaneous cancer remission rare, but worth study," Chicago Tribune, September 29, 2014.   Deardorff: Spon Remission review 2014

Donnelly John J., Britta Wahren and Margaret A. Liu, "DNA Vaccines: Progress and Challenges," The Journal of Immunology, July 15, 2005, vol. 175 no. 2 633-639.   Donnelly: Vaccine progress 2005  [ The knowledge that is being gained in the pursuit of more effective DNA vaccines also is enriching the development of “conventional” vaccine approaches, and this understanding may well facilitate the invention of effective new vaccines for cancer and infectious diseases. ]

EnCognitive.com, "Dr Sam Chachoua."  EnCognitive: Chachoua

Eng Charis, "Can Your Body’s Bacteria Cause Cancer?" Health Essentials, Cleveland Clinic, August 11, 2015, [Inside the body’s microbiome]   Eng: Bacteria cause cancer 2015

Evans Greg, "Bill Maher Gives Charlie Sheen’s Goat Milk Doctor Some Real Time," Deadline Hollywood, January 30, 2016.   Evans: Maher time for Chachoua 2016

Greenwood Veronique, "16% of Cancers Are Caused by Viruses or Bacteria," Discover, May 9, 2012.   Greenwood: 16% Viruses & bacteria cause cancers 2012

Gulley Ames L.J., "Pilot Study of Vaccination with Recombinant CEA-MUC-1-TRICOM Poxviral-Based Vaccines in Patients with Metastatic Carcinoma," Clin Cancer Res, May 15, 2008, 14; 3060   Gulley: Vaccination of cancer patients 2008 [ We report here a pilot study of 25 patients treated with a poxviral vaccine regimen consisting of the genes for CEA and MUC-1, along with a triad of costimulatory molecules (TRICOM; composed of B7.1, intercellular adhesion molecule 1, and lymphocyte function–associated antigen 3) engineered into vaccinia (PANVAC-V) as a prime vaccination and into fowlpox (PANVAC-F) as a booster vaccination. This trial shows that PANVAC-VF is safe and is associated with the generation of CD8 and CD4 antigen–specific immune responses postvaccination. These immune responses were seen in more than half of patients tested. Furthermore, this trial provides early evidence of clinical benefit. ]

Hirschberg Caryle and Brendan O'Regan, "Spontaneous Remission An Annotated Bibliography," Institute of Noetic Sciences, June 1993.   Hirschberg: Biography spon Remissions 1993

Ho Kok-Ho, "Spontaneous regression of cancer: A therapeutic role for pyrogenic infections?" Australian Student Medical Journal, 2012, Volume 3, Issue 2.  Ho: Infections linked to cancer remission 2012

Jessy Thomas, "Immunity over inability: The spontaneous regression of cancer," J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2011 Jan-Jun; 2(1): 43–49.   Jessy: Spontaneous regression of cancer 2011 [ Nature's way of fighting cancer ]

Lenzer Jeanne, "The Body Can Beat Terminal Cancer," Discover Magazine, September issue, 2007, [August 21, 2007].   Lenzer: Body can beat cancer 2007

McCarthy Aine, "Have researchers really discovered a ‘new miracle drug to cure nine in 10 cancers’? No, but the research is fascinating Category," Cancer Research UK, October 14, 2015.   McCarthy: new therapy to fight most cancers 2015

Oleksyszyn Jozef, Joanna Wietrzyk and Mateusz Psurski, "Cancer ? Could it be Cured? A Spontaneous Regression of Cancer, Cancer Energy Metabolism, Hyperglycemia-Hypoglycemia, Metformin, Warburg and Crabtree Effects and a New Perspective in Cancer Treatment," Journal of Cancer Science & Therapy, February 24, 2014.   Oleksyszyn: Curing Cancer by remission 2014

Parsonnet J., "Bacterial infection as a cause of cancer," Environ Health Perspect, November, 1995, 103(Suppl 8): 263–268.   Parsonnet: Bacterial infection causes cancer 1995

Pesmen Curtis, "What Five Years Really Means [Survival statistics mean different things for different cancers]," Cure, March 16, 2007.  Pesmen: what cure means 2007

Cancer cure = disease-specific survival: It is the percentage of cancer patients who have survived for a certain period of time after diagnosis compared to people who do not have cancer. National Cancer Institute

Pleomotphism: When a grub turns into a butterfly, this is know as metamorphism, if it could turn back into a grub again that would be known as Pleomorphism.

Pleo-morphismmeans many living forms; many or more (pleo-), forms or bodies (morph-), capable of changing from one type of organism to another. This is in contradistinction (distinction by contrast) to Mono-morphism which means one (mono-) body or form. Modern medicine, bacteriology, is founded on the idea of Mono-morphism, where once a germ is a particular germ it always stays that way. According to this way of thinking, a streptococcal germ is always a streptococcus. It only has one (mono-) form; it doesn't change into anything else. However, that is not true. Streptococcal germs and many other kinds of germs, bacteria and viruses can, and do, change into other forms, proven to occur by many eminent researchers since the early 1800s, including Royal Rife, Gaston Naessens, Antoine Béchamp and Dr. George Merkl.

Béchamp then went further in his argument for pleomorphism, contending that bacteria could "devolve" into smaller, unseen forms, what he called "microzymia." Béchamp developed the theory that micro-organisms could change their essential size as well as their shape, depending on the state of health of the organism in which the micro-organism lived.  he microzyma changes into a bacterium or virus which immediately goes to work to rid the body of this harmful material. When the bacteria or viruses have completed their task of consuming the harmful material they automatically revert to the microzyma stage."

After death, it is essential that matter is restored to its primitive condition, for it has only been lent for a time to the living, organized being. . . . The living being, filled by microzymas, carries in himself the elements essential for life, for disease, for death, and for destruction.

Pleomorphic objects go through life cycles of various forms, depending on the state of the environment of the body or of the “soil” of the animal or human being. Such living, dynamic changes of microorganisms can only be observed in live tissues, such as a live drop of blood, water or body fluid. Unfortunately, most of the research that became established in the medical and bacteriology fields was done on dead, stained tissues. Of course, there, you will only see one form of an organism (Mono-morphism). hese microzyma are present in the tissues and blood of all living organisms where they remain normally quiescent (quiet and not acting) and harmless. When the welfare of the human body is threatened by the presence of potentially harmful material, a transmutation (change) takes place.

These tiny life forms behave like the garbage-cleaners of living tissue and they multiply and morph into a fungal-like form in a low-oxygen acid environment (as in death). If your tissues become a low-oxygen acid waste-land and they start to invade, your immune system may become activated.

Printz Carrie, "Spontaneous Regression of Melanoma May Offer Insight Into Cancer Immunology," JNCI: Jnl of National Cancer Institute, 2001, Volume 93, Issue 14Pp. 1047-1048.   Printz: Spontaneous regression delimma 2001

Ricci Sante Basso and Ugo Cerchiari, "Spontaneous regression of malignant tumors: Importance of the immune system and other factors (Review)," Oncol Letters, November, 2010, 1(6): 941–945.   Ricci: Spont Regression Review 2010

Rochlitz Christoph and others, "Phase I immunotherapy with a modified vaccinia virus (MVA) expressing human MUC1 as antigen-specific immunotherapy in patients with MUC1-positive advanced cancer," The Journal of Gene Medicine, August 2003, Volume 5, Issue 8, pages 690–699.   Rochlitz virus vaccine tested in cancer 2003 [ "TG4010 is a viral suspension of a recombinant vaccinia vector (MVA) containing DNA sequences coding for the human MUC1 antigen and interleukin-2 (IL-2). This product was developed for use as a vaccine in cancer patients whose tumors express the MUC1 antigen. The objective of the present study was to determine the safety of the product and to define the dose of TG4010 to be used in further clinical trials.  Tolerance of TG4010 was excellent, and side effects mainly consisted of injection site pain and influenza-like symptoms. There was no apparent detrimental effect of repeated injections of the vaccinia virus." ]

Salber Patricia, "Radical Remission from Cancer: 9 Keys to Healing," The Doctor Weighs In, January 27, 2016.   Salber: Turner keys to cancer healing 2016

Salanti Ali and others, "Targeting Human Cancer by a Glycosaminoglycan Binding Malaria Protein," Cancer Cell, Volume 28, Issue 4, p500–514, 12 October 2015.  Salanti: binding malaria virus to cancer 2015

Soussi Thierry, "p53 Antibodies in the Sera of Patients with Various Types of Cancer: A Review 1," Cancer Res, April 1, 2000, 60; 1777.   Soussi: Serum of cancer patients 2000

Tontonoz Matthew, "Do Bacteria Cause Cancer?" Cancer Research Institute, March 10, 2014.   Tontonoz: Bacteria cancer link 2014

Walker Morton, "Induced Remission Therapy," German Cancer Therapies: Natural and Conventional Medicines That Offer Hope, New York : Kensington, 2003, Chapter 10.pp 167-181.   Walker: Induced Remission Therapy   

Wikipedia, "Cancer bacteria."   Wiki: Cancer bacteria

Wikipedia, "Oncolytic virus."  Wiki: virus - cancer connection   Back to top arrowup