By Walter Sorochan Posted February 05 2016, updated November 18, 2021. Disclaimer The information presented here is for informative and educational purposes only and is not intended as curative or prescriptive advice.
Introduction: Cancer vaccine is here! The cancer cure therapy attracted the attention of many viewers of the Bill Maher show on January 29, 2016. Maher interviewed Dr. Sam Chachoua, MD from Australia, who claimed he had a cure for cancer. Such a claim on national TV revived hope that a cure for cancer is here now! Evans: Maher time for Chachoua 2016 But is such a claim real or a hoax? The doctor's story has its ups and downs as a research issue and also as a cure. In the midst of controversy, this article examines the many issues of the claim, reviews briefly the history of spontaneous remissions of cancer, lists supporting evidence for Chachoua's claims and that a cancer vaccine has been developed .... but cancer has NOT been cured. [ Read on to find out more ] Cancer remission controversy The research about Chachoua's claims of natural cancer remission began in honest attempts by this independent researchrt to get at the truth. But some real concerns surfaced about Chuachoua's claims. Exploratory research about historical remissions in cancer uncovered more recent information about current research trends in this area. Thus, the initial focus of verifying Chachoua's claims were expanded to updating the history behind cancer remission and also the current medical trend in applying viral vaccines to treating cancers. Although mother nature's miraculous healing powers are not fully understood nor accepted at this time, many cancer researchers are starting to view vaccine induced spontaneous remissions as a real alternative to orthodoxy cancer therapy. Needless to say, this emerging trend is causing a lot of confusion, competitive fighting among healers and controversy. The claims by Chachoua are not new. There have been many reports that cancer patients went into remission and have survived for many years thereafter. Cases of spontaneous regression have fueled speculation that cancer may be vulnerable to sudden surges of the immune system, which can occur with a high fever, bacterial infection, blood transfusion, or major surgery or antibiotic usage. The reaction may deprive the tumor of something it needs to survive — blood, lactic acid, thyroid hormones — and thus starve it until it collapses and dies. The basic problem is inconsistency in explaining what caused the remissions. Information explaining cancer vaccine is complicated and difficult to find. Chachoua has simplified the medical jargon by using an easy to understand approach to how a cancer vaccine is made, how it works and the theory behind it. Chachoua's explanations are supported by other medical researchers. It is for these reasons that much of the information about cancer vaccine is taken from medical doctor and researcher Samir Chachoua and other medical researchers. Researcher Sorochan has attempted to simplify the scientific explanations for the readers. To begin with, Deardorff's brief comments about such cancer remissions are worth noting: "In few rare cases, people defy cancer without medical treatment or by using therapies that are considered inadequate, a phenomenon known as spontaneous remission. Scientists have been fascinated and baffled by these developments for as long as cancer has been recognized as a disease. Was it luck? Or did the patients do something special to harness the awesome power of the immune system? Studying these exceptional people, however, is fraught with difficulty, controversy and the dangers of promoting bad science. The potential benefits of highlighting the unusual recoveries should be balanced against the risks, experts warn, including offering patients false hope, blaming those who succumb and encouraging alternative treatments in place of conventional methods that could prolong or save lives." Deardorff: Spon Remission review 2014 Another researcher reviewing cancer remissions, Kelly Turner, PhD., concluded in her book, Radical Remission, that there were about nine factors playing a role in spontaneous remissions. She concluded that we can shift the odds of remission in our favor by focusing on healing factors [ such as making significant lifestyle changes, radically altering the diet, using herbs, supplements and embracing social support ] that are often overlooked by medical experts. Deardorff: Spon Remission review 2014 It is impossible to know how often spontaneous remission occurs because physicians often do not document or publish such cases, or the patient may simply stop showing up at the doctor's office and most cancer patients in the past century have been conveniently treated in one way or another with poor documentation. However, lack of understanding about cancer and other shortcomings like healing bias may also suppress researchers and doctors having an open mind about remissions from cancer. This article searches for the truth! Back to top
So .... back to Chachoua and his claim of the magic bullet for cancer! What is the magic Chachoua cure? Dr. Sam Chachoua's cure for cancer is a vaccine serum. The serum had viruses that would attach to cancer cells, marking them up for identification so the immune cells can destroy them. Currently, cancer cells cannot be identified by the immune system and that is why they are not attacked and destroyed. Article by Chachoua: Chachoua is no longer active. Chachoua claims that such a vaccine serum cures cancer, HIV and heals heart disease and other disorders. Such claims are supported by Coley's experiments prior to his death in 1936. Lenzer: Body can beat cancer 2007 Dr. Chachoua searched for non-toxic biological agents that could duplicate the findings in spontaneous remissions. He developed a range of anti-sera, vaccines and microbiological extracts that could target the cause of the disease and remove it from the body. In cancer, AIDS, and other conditions where the body cannot recognize or adequately deal with the disease, he developed “tagging agents” that could stick to the body of the cancer cells [disease], allowing cancer cells to be seen by the immune cells and then destroyed. In short, if a cancer cell can be made to look like a cold or flu, by “tagging” it with cold or flu fragments, then the body will eliminate it as it would a common infection. Perhaps the most dramatic capacity of this technology is its ability to repair cellular damage at the genetic level; purifying infected cells from HIV, regenerating hepatitis damaged livers, scarred heart tissue and even atrophied brain tissue in Alzheimer’s patients. Back to top How Induced Remission Therapy works: Induced Remission Therapies [IRT] possess ever-active cancer-reversing properties. The treatment achieves its healing effects by both the use of vaccines prepared by Dr. Samir Chachoua's laboratory methods and clinical procedures. The information about remission in this section is from Dr. Chachoua. Article by Chachoua: Chachoua is no longer active. Chachoua: vaccine Patent 2003 Early opportunities for cancer remission "The greatest value of Coley's Toxins is evident in the lives of patients who received his therapy. Rather than surviving additional years with cancer, many of these patients lived the rest of their lives without cancer." Jessy: Spontaneous regression of cancer 2011 Coley’s toxin is a mixture of heat-killed Streptococcus pyogenes and Serratia marcescens. However, initially, many different strains of bacteria were used and a good therapeutic effect was observed with the infection of tumor patients with diphtheria, gonorrhea, hepatitis, influenza, malaria, measles, smallpox, syphilis and tuberculosis. One interesting observation is evident: efficacy is correlated with the degree of fever induced by the toxins/bacteria. Patients treated with Coley’s toxin that develops a fever between 38-40°C respond three times better than patients with a lower body temperature. Oleksyszyn: Curing Cancer by remission 2014 "After the early success of Coley’s toxins, momentum was lost when Coley died in 1936. Emergence of chemotherapy and radiotherapy overshadowed its development while aseptic techniques gradually gained acceptance. After World War II, large-scale production of antibiotics and antipyretics also allowed better suppression of infections and fevers. Opportunities for further clinical studies using Coley’s toxins were lost when despite decades of use, it was classified as a new drug by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Tightening of regulations regarding clinical trials of new drugs after the thalidomide incidents in the 1960s meant that Coley’s toxins were highly unlikely to pass the stringent safety requirements. With fewer infections, spontaneous regressions became less common. An estimated yearly average of over twenty cases in the 1960-80s decreased to less than ten cases in the 1990s. It was gradually believed that the body’s immune system had a negligible role in tumor regression and focus was placed on chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Despite initial promise, these therapies have not fulfilled their full potential and the treatment for certain cancers remains out of reach. In a curious turn of events, advances in molecular engineering have now provided us with the tools to transform immunotherapy into a viable alternative. Coley’s toxins have provided the foundations for early immunotherapeutic approaches and may potentially contribute significantly to the success of future immunotherapy." Ho: Infections linked to cancer remission 2012 The Induced Remission Therapies [IRT] do not destroy viral mechanisms but use them to displace the virus from its genetic locus. Genetic and other fragments originating from the patients own cells and/or non-pathogenic organism are used to eliminate the virus from its nuclear and cytoplasmic habitat. Many of these vaccines, by using the viruses own reverse transcriptase, insert themselves in the vicinity of the viral DNA, resulting in the latter’s removal and expulsion. This induced vaccine therapy represents a new age in AIDS and cancer therapeutics aimed at genetic editing and correction. These vaccines do not harbor toxic effects, are therapeutic as well as preventative and are not made from HIV or fragments thereof; thereby eliminating the theoretical risk of contagion associated with HIV based vaccines. "The advantage of inheriting an autoimmune response -- even an adverse one -- is that it penetrates the cells, including cancer cells. The agent required to change the appearance of a cancer cell is acquired by use of Dr. Chachoua's technique, and that agent is then planted into the cancer cell nucleus [ its heart and brain ]. Then the body develops an altered immune response that goes into the cancer cell and genetically corrects the disease. In effect, IRT makes the cancer cell look like something that the body's immunity will attack and then provides that very same immune response to fight the disease." "Patients undergoing spontaneous remission for cancer do so in response to the presence of an acute infection. In contrast, a chronic infection actually can cause cancer. That's because an aggressive and acute infection stimulates metabolic immune response [MIT] in cancer cells so that they commit preprogrammed suicide [apoptosis] and melt away." "Cancer cells undergoing spontaneous remission survive in chaos! They arise for only short periods of time to hold and restrain a pathological invader until the body can put up an appropriate immune response. Then the cancer cells commit apoptotic suicide and leave the body as waste products." "For example, in tetanus-injecting experiments on laboratory rats simultaneously given cancer by Dr. Chachoua, the rats did not die from tetanus when ordinarily they should have succumbed in days. The encapsulation of tetanus organisms by cancer cells protected the animals against coming down with the infection. The same thing happens in plants. Crown gall disease is a plant cancer that protects the plant against infection with Agrobacterium tumefaciens." The immune system fails to recognize a cancer cell as a pathogen and so it's dangerous characteristics remain hidden from any immune response. But when the cancer cell is planted with a common infection such as measles, mumps, the flu or a cold virus, the antigens are expressed on the surface of the cancer cells for up to three weeks. This gives a window of opportunity for the immune cells to rush in and attack the cancer cells. Once the cancer cells have been deposed within the three weeks, then the immune system becomes blind once again to the cancer cells. It is during this 3-week window that Dr. Chachoua's Iduced Remission Therapies [IRT] is able to correct the genetic blueprint and correct the cell damage at the same gene level. Cancers die during this 3-week period and remission takes place. Below is a short video of how Metablic Immune response [IRT] works: Dr. Samir Chachoua: treatment for AIDS, cancer and Heart disease; Length = Nov 3, 2009:
3 mns. Basis for Chachoua's theory: "Cancer seldom affects a person exhibiting an autoimmune illness." That is, a person with an autoimmune disorder will not get cancer. Here are several explanations of this observation: "Herpes simplex virus (HSV) was one of the first viruses to be adapted to attack cancer cells selectively, because it was well understood, easy to manipulate and relatively harmless in its natural state (merely causing cold sores) so likely to pose fewer risks. The herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) mutant 1716 lacks both copies of the ICP34.5 gene, and as a result is no longer able to replicate in terminally differentiated and non-dividing cells but will infect and cause lysis very efficiently in cancer cells, and this has proved to be an effective tumor-targeting strategy. In a wide range of in vivo cancer models, the HSV1716 virus has induced tumor regression and increased survival times." Chachoua: Promiise of cancer cure All these observations led Chachoua to come up with something he called "nemesis theory", which states that for every disease there's an anti-disease organism which will specifically attack and destroy it. Chachoua: Promiise of cancer cure Back to topNemesis organisms: Article by Chachoua: Chachoua is no longer active.Chachoua got thousands of bottles in a laboratory and placed leukemia lymph node tumor biopsies in them. Each bottle had a particular organism growing inside it. The one with affinity for the cancer actually grabbed hold of the cancer and ate it. This protein 'web' actually grew as a fungus and encapsulated the tumor. Within a few days, there was a little bit of the cancer left. A couple of weeks later, no cancer, just the fungus! So what this procedure did was give Chachoua a new therapeutic modality. This nemesis organism gave him highly specific chemicals that could be used to kill the cancer, but which can be made so the new modality does not attack any other sort of body tissue. Second, it gave Chachoua tagging complexes which stick to the outside of the cancer cells and make the cancer cells highly visible to the immune system. And three, it can give Chachoua a complete range of digestive enzymes which are specific for digesting the cancer cells and the cancers alone. So this new form of serum not just kills the disease, it also cleans up after itself! With use of the tagging system, if the immune system looks at this fibrillary network of protein stuck onto the outside of the cancer cell, it doesn't see cancer; it sees a bug and it wants to go after the bug. Now, you don't inject the bug; you purify the protein extract that sticks to the cancer and you inject that. That then sticks to the cancer cells in the body. The body's immune cells can then see it and recognize it because it's tagged with bacterial, fungal or viral protein. The process of the immune system getting rid of a cough or a cold in a week or two is similar to how Chachoua's serum gets rid of cancer cells. His vaccine can get rid of cancer: make the cancer look like a cough or a cold by sticking cough or cold particles on it, and have the immune system attack the cancer, destroy it and remove it. However, there were instances where patients had a regression several months or years after treatment of their tumors with a tagging complex. This suggested that tagging the cancer was not the be-all and end-all, that tagging the cancer cell still didn't cure cancer the disease. This suggested to Chachoua that there was another factor at work. Back to top The Rational for Spontaneous Remission - the historical basis for Chachoua's vaccine Chachoua: Part 2The one thing Chachoua found depressing about alternative and conventional therapy is that they both totally ignored the phenomenon of "spontaneous remission" .... which is perhaps the most natural phenomenon which repeatedly tells us how to cure terminal disease. "Spontaneous remission" is a term given to miraculous healings, where people on their death bed ’rise from the dead’ within two to three days without a trace of their disease. It’s a phenomenon that’s been reported in the literature but hardly ever investigated. The data on spontaneous remission strongly suggest that just before a person with cancer, heart disease, arthritis or any of the other terminal diseases has a spontaneous remission or a cure of their disease, they suffer what seems to be a viral or bacterial or some form of severe infection. Here are three examples of this: This was noticed by a Dr Didot, in France, who noted that the existence of syphilis precluded the appearance of cancer. If prostitutes had syphilis, they were very unlikely to develop cancer. This doctor actually treated 20 cancer patients with syphilis and, of those 20, 14 went into total remission. As the syphilis grew, it munched up the cancer; the cancer went away. Another three patients did pretty well, and a couple of them died of the syphilis. But this was a few hundred years ago, and given the choice between "the Big C" and "the Big S." Today we can cure syphilis with a couple of shots of penicillin but treating cancer is not the came! Late last century, Dr William Coley had a patient who had bone cancer and developed a severe syphilis or skin infection. As the skin infection grew, it munched on the bone cancer and the bone cancer disappeared. Dr Coley went on to develop what he called "Coley’s toxins" and used them for many years as a therapy that got quite good results. It’s been long known that in areas where malaria exists, there’s no cancer; and when you get rid of malaria, drain the swamps, kill the mosquitoes, the cancer rate rises. People who have cancer and who catch malaria have a chance of going into remission. Just recently, Dr Henry Heimlich [who developed the Heimlich maneuver for preventing choking] injected a few AIDS patients with malaria and managed to get them into some form of remission where they improved and stayed stable at the improved level. All these observations led Chachoua to come up with something called "nemesis theory", which states that for every disease there’s an anti-disease organism which will specifically attack and destroy it. This then led to the development of "nemesis therapy", where he made extracts of these "nemesis organisms" with which to treat specific diseases like cancer and Aids. Chachoua: Part 2 Back to top
Pleomorphism is a new-old idea that most persons may not understand and medical doctors have been schooled to reject. The inner terrain [ colon] argument against Pasteur’s germ theory [ metamorphism] gained more support with pleomorphism. Independent research determined that microbes already exist within the body, more of them than human cells, and morph according to their cellular environment. They become pathogenic as they’re forced to survive in a damaged cellular environment. The waste products of these microbes create even more damage. Further research determined that these microbes often already exist in human cells in benign states. They don’t all come from “out there”, and they’re not pathogenic in healthy environments; they simply become so in unhealthy toxic environments [ as within the colon ]. What does come from “out there” are environmental toxins and toxic foods that make it difficult for benign microbes to survive. Then they morph into those nasty little critters. [ When a grub turns into a butterfly, this is know as metamorphism, if it could turn back into a grub again that would be known as Pleomorphism. ] Below drawings of different basic forms of pleomorphs [missing are simatids, yeasts, fungus]:
Explanation of basic basic forms in the above illustration for spores & flagellation of bacteria: A coccus; B diplococcus; C
streptococcus; D staphylococcus; E sarcines ;F rods; G vibriones; H corynebacteria; I spores (1/2=central, 3=terminal, 4=subterminal; J spirilles;
K peritrichous flagellation; L 1=monopolar monotrichous flagellation, 2=monopolar polytrichous flagellation.
Live human blood observed through a phase contrast microscope with 3,600 times magnification. For more information about metamorphism vs Pleomorphism go to New medicine The video below explains this phenomenon: Pleomorphism explained video 9:55 mns long Success Rate: Dr Chachoua's sera and vaccines have been tested. They've proven to be more effective than anything else in history. His cancer serum has been proven to be 85% effective against cancers while his AIDS serum is 99% effective in putting AIDS into remission for six months to upwards of three years. EnCognitive: Chachoua NOTE: The vaccines that he does have possession of and all the new ones that he develops are still much more effective and without the negative
side effectscompared to Conventional Medicine therapy.
Old way of making serum vaccines: Chachoua compares the old way of making serum to fight diseases with using antibiotics. "One of the easiest ways to deal with the greatest plague today is to use an animal system that’s resistant to the plague, and treat and cure the people suffering from the disease. A hundred years ago, before we had antibiotics, the only therapy we had for pneumonia, smallpox and polio was horse serum. They’d get a horse, shoot it with a disease, draw the horse serum out, shoot that into the person and cure them. That was therapy to deal with the plagues a hundred years ago. But what happens if you do apply it now? Here’s the case of a young man with AIDS. He’s 32 years old. He’s got a pneumocystis pneumonia, he’s short of breath, he’s got a T-cell count of 80 and a T4/T8 imbalance. So, essentially, his blood, his virus, is extracted out; an animal, such as a horse, is vaccinated with his blood; the antiserum from the animal is then purified against this patient’s blood so it doesn’t cause allergic reactions; and the patient is treated with the horse’s serum. And we see that within 24 hours, the pneumocystis pneumonia clears up. That’s pretty remarkable considering that the best that antibiotics can do, if they can clear it, is take days to weeks. This patient’s symptoms resolved; his T-cell count went up to 780 within 10 days from a low of 80, and his T4/T8 ratio became normal. Chachoua: Part 2 Back to top Cost of Dr Chachoua's therapy: EnCognitive: ChachouaBasic IRT vaccine for a short time is made by using measles or mumps virus or an animal virus at a cost of just a few hundred dollars. More sophisticated vaccines a for longer time may cost several thousand dollars. Dr. Sam has formed the Save-a-Life Foundation located in Boulder, Colorado, that raises funding for more IRT research and on occasion does provide financial assistance. Dr. Sam Chachoua's therapies for HIV/AIDS, Heart Disease, and Cancer are now available. All you need is a physician willing to administer it. The price is APPROXIMATELY $10,000.00 per therapy. Each therapy is administered in seven injections over a 15 day period. People with cardiovascular disease report that they begin to feel better within minutes of the first injections. EnCognitive: Chachoua Availability - Where to get IRT therapy: IRT is used extensively by German cancer therapies, and in the Bahamas, Central And South America, Mexico, Guatemala and Argentina. ORT os available as a vaccine in United States and Canada under the Health Freedoms Act. Dr. Chachoua does not sell this vaccine and offers free training to practicing physicians so the physicians may implement it for patients. Walker: Induced Remission Therapy Below is a video about shattering the myth of cancer: Dr. Sam Chachoua - Shattering the Myth of Incurable Disease Length = 2:00 hours Chachoua's troubles: Claims made by Chachoua having a vaccine to cure cancer have been rejected by the medical establishment, the USA Communicable Disease Center and Federal Food and Drug Administration. These rejections have persisted over the past 30 years, despite scientific proof and acceptance of his cancer cures in many parts of the world. Such rejections, especially in Canada and the United States, have made life miserable for Dr. Chachoua. You can read about his misfortunes at: Black:Victory over UCLA 2000 EnCognitive: Chachoua Dreddy: blog Evidence supporting Chachoua's observation and theory of microbial changes occurring in cancer remissions:This researcher found numerous articles quoting the research being done on cancer remissions linked to the immune system. Spontaneous remission therapies, like that of Chachoua, are no longer being suppressed. Cann: Spontaneous regression of cancer 2002 Deardorff: Spon Remission review 2014 Donnelly: Vaccine progress 2005 Gulley: Vaccination of cancer patients 2008 Ho: Infections linked to cancer remission 2012 Jessy: Spontaneous regression of cancer 2011 Lenzer: Body can beat cancer 2007 Printz: Spontaneous regression delimma 2001 Ricci: Spont Regression Review 2010 Rochlitz virus vaccine tested in cancer 2003 Walker: Induced Remission Therapy Oleksyszyn: Curing Cancer by remission 2014 Cantwell: Bacteria causing leukemia 2012 Salanti: binding malaria virus to cancer 2015 Kelly Turner's book on Radical Remission: "shows how we can shift the odds of remission in our favor. She gathered information for her PhD dissertation at UC, Berkeley, spending a year traveling around the world to meet and learn from alternative cancer healers. She also interviewed over a thousand people who had experienced “spontaneous” remissions from their advanced cancers. Turner does not ask anyone to abandon conventional therapy, but instructs them on how to add healing factors that are often overlooked.” During the course of the study, Kelly identified more than seventy-five factors that cancer survivors said they used as a part of their healing journey. Nine of these factors were used by almost every one of them. Eight of these are as follows: Salber: Turner keys to cancer healing 2016
David Spiegel, a professor at the Stanford University School of Medicine, published a paper in 1989 in The Lancet, showed that women with terminal breast cancer who were enrolled in supportive therapy had a significant survival advantage over women who were not enrolled in support groups. Women who were in support groups experienced an improved quality of life. Lenzer: Body can beat cancer 2007 Wiki: virus - cancer connection: "Herpes simplex virus (HSV) was one of the first viruses to be adapted to attack cancer cells selectively, because it was well understood, easy to manipulate and relatively harmless in its natural state (merely causing cold sores) so likely to pose fewer risks. The herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) mutant 1716 lacks both copies of the ICP34.5 gene, and as a result is no longer able to replicate in terminally differentiated and non-dividing cells but will infect and cause lysis very efficiently in cancer cells, and this has proved to be an effective tumor-targeting strategy. In a wide range of in vivo cancer models, the HSV1716 virus has induced tumor regression and increased survival times. Other oncolytic viruses based on HSV have also been developed and are in clinical trials, most notably GM-CSF, developed by Amgen, which has successfully completed a pivotal Phase III trial for advanced melanoma. This study met its primary endpoint (durable response rate) with a very high degree of statistical significance in March 2013, the first positive phase 3 study for an oncolytic virus in the western world." Wiki: virus - cancer connection An Onocolytic Virus is one that preferentially infects and kills cancer cells. As the infected cancer cells are destroyed by lysis they release new infectious virus particles to help destroy the remaining tumor. Oncolytic viruses are thought not only to cause direct destruction of the tumor cells, but also to stimulate host anti-tumor immune responses. Throughout the history of medicine, physicians have recorded cases of spontaneous remission. Such cases involve not just cancer but conditions like aortic aneurysm, a deadly ballooning of the heart’s major artery; Peyronie’s disease, a deformity of the penis; and childhood cataracts. Lenzer: Body can beat cancer 2007 Bacteria, primarily in the coccus-like form in microscopic tissue sections, are found in various forms of cancer. Parsonnet: Bacterial infection causes cancer 1995 Tontonoz: Bacteria cancer link 2014 Eng: Bacteria cause cancer 2015 In addition, similar microbes have been observed in non-cancerous diseases, such as sarcoidosis, lupus erythematosus, scleroderma, and others. Cantwell reviewed the confirmations of numerous scientists about the phenomenon of pleomorphism [ microbes changing from one form to another ] occurring in cancer patients. Although such microbes are still looked upon with disbelief by many bacteriologists, this pleomorphism is consistent with bacteria cultured and studied by various cancer microbial researchers over the past century. Cantwell: Bacteria causing leukemia 2012 Bacteria seem to cause the genes to promote tumor growth rather than suppress it. On top of that, changes in the bacterial community in a tumor were associated with advanced cancers instead of early ones. Article by Eng: Bacteria cause cancer is no longer active. When bacteria are threatened by the immune system or by antibiotics they may lose their cell-wall and assume a different growth form that renders them less susceptible to attack by the immune system. There is no observable inflammation or other symptoms and this mystifies most medical doctors as they have been schooled that one bacteria divides into two same bacteria form and not transforming into a different microbe. Although the idea of a cancer microbe is medical heresy, there is ample data to show that cancer patients are highly prone to bacterial infection. Wiki: Cancer bacteria When dis-ease occurs these microbes become aggressive, giving rise to a host of diseases, some of which are cancerous, and others that are inflammatory, degenerative, or simply transitory. Another reason for physicians to doubt that a single type of germ could cause such a variety of pathologic effects. Mostly ignored over the past century is research showing that pleomorphic bacteria, particularly unusual growth forms of mycobacteria, are implicated in Hodgkin’s and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Mycobacteria not only cause human TB and other forms of “atypical” tuberculosis, but produce various other inflammations in many different life forms. Cantwell reports many cancer researchers whose researches confirm Chachoua's claims. Cantwell: Bacteria causing leukemia 2012 Another recent classic development supporting microbes causing cancer was the discovery that stomach ulcers was caused by a bacteria: "In 2005 the Nobel Prize in medicine was given to two Australian researchers, microbiologist Barry J Marshall and pathologist J Robin Warren, who discovered that stomach ulcers were caused by bacteria that millions of people carry normally in their stomach. For a century these bacteria, now identifiable in tissue with a special tissue stain, went undetected by physicians, all of whom were taught that bacteria could not live in the acid environment of the stomach. Now a curative antibiotic treatment has been designed to treat Helicobacter pylori infection. We also now recognize that chronic infection with helicobacteria can lead to stomach cancer, and also to a lymphoma cancer of the stomach, known as "MALT-lymphoma" (mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma)." Cantwell: Hodgkin's disease & bacteria 2006 Tontonoz: Bacteria cancer link 2014 A new paper in The Lancet takes a look at the very best data on the prevalence of infection-caused cancers and comes up with some striking numbers. Overall, they estimate that 16% of cancer cases worldwide in 2008 had an infectious cause—2 million out of 12.7 million. And because this paper only looked at infectious agents that are clearly carcinogenic and avoided those where there was not much data on, 2 million cases total is probably something of an underestimate. Greenwood: 16% Viruses & bacteria cause cancers 2012 This very recent confession from a renown medical journal helps to vindicate Chachoua's claims and the issue about viruses and bacteria causing cancer. In 2015, writer-reporter Bushak makes reference to the new approach of microbes and immunology to fighting cancer. There is definitely as shift from the traditional use of radiation, chemotherapy and surgery to using immunology to fight cancer. Bushak: Programming bacteria to kill cancer 2015 Back to top
|